Topic: Academic Performance, Antisocial Behavior, Behavioral Problems, Mentorship, Resilience
Target Population: Adolescents, Middle Childhood
Sector: School-Based
This program is for students in kindergarten through 12th grade who are at risk of dropping out of school.
Check & Connect, a targeted school-based dropout-prevention program, is designed to improve participants' academic performance, behavior, and attendance by matching students with trained mentors who actively monitor and engage with students.
Results across several randomized controlled trials are mixed. Positive results include significant increases up to 4 years after program implementation on students’ participation in school and school performance when compared to control students, significant decreases in drop-out rates at the end of high school, and significant increases in students’ participation with their transition plans in their Individualized Education Programs in comparison to control students. However, other studies have found no differences between intervention and control groups in grade point average, academic progress, core course failures, measures of attendance, office disciplinary referrals, student-teacher relationships, goal-setting and problem-solving, measures of engagement, the likelihood of dropping out, or graduation rates. In addition, studies have been conducted on elementary school students; however, results are unclear due to study design.
Check & Connect creates partnerships among the school, home, and family using four primary components that are designed to enhance students' engagement in school.
These four components work to counter student risk factors that may lead to low academic performance, dropping out of school, and anti-social behavior.
Check & Connect, developed by the University of Minnesota in 1990, has been used across the United States and internationally.
This program is implemented by trained mentors, who are typically in-school staff members. There is a comprehensive manual to help with program implementation and several on-site and off-site options for training. On-site, off-site, and online training options are available on the following topics: Preparation and Implementation, Mentor Training, and Fidelity of Implementation. Please visit www.checkandconnect.umn.edu/training_consultation/default.html for more information.
Considerations for implementing this program include acquiring administrative and participant buy-in, recruiting facilitators and ensuring they receive training, finding time for mentors and students to meet during an existing daily schedule, and ensuring the intervention is implemented with fidelity.
The Clearinghouse can help address these considerations. Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
If you are interested in implementing Check & Connect, the Clearinghouse is interested in helping you!
Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
This program operates throughout the school year, and mentors check in with their students weekly. Mentor engagement with parents varies. Mentors typically maintain their caseloads for a minimum of 2 years.
Implementation costs vary based on location and number of mentors and participants. The manual and supporting materials are included in the training costs or can be purchased separately. If purchased separately, manuals cost $50 each.
To move Check & Connect to the Promising category on the Clearinghouse Continuum of Evidence at least one evaluation with a strong study design must be conducted that demonstrates sustained, positive effects on all key program outcomes.
The Clearinghouse can help you develop an evaluation plan to ensure the program components are meeting your goals.
Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
Contact the Clearinghouse with any questions regarding this program.
Phone: 1-877-382-9185 Email: Clearinghouse@psu.edu
You may also contact Check & Connect by mail Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, 2025 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55414, phone 1-866-434-0010, email checkandconnect@umn.edu, or visit http://www.checkandconnect.umn.edu/contactus/default.html
http://www.checkandconnect.umn.edu/; Heppen et al. (2017); and Powers, Hagans, and Linn (2017).
Guryan, J., Christenson, S., Cureton, A., Lai, I., Ludwig, J., Schwarz, C., … Turner, M. C. (2021). The effect of mentoring on school attendance and academic outcomes: A randomized evaluation of the check & connect program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(3), 841-882. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22264
Heppen, J. B., Zeiser, K., Holtzman, D. J., O'Cummings, M., Christenson, S., & Pohl, A. (2018). Efficacy of the Check & Connect mentoring program for at-risk general education high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(1), 56-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1318990
Maynard, B. R., Kjellstrand, E. K., & Thompson, A. M. (2014). Effects of Check and Connect on attendance, behavior, and academics: A randomized effectiveness trial. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(3), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513497804
Powers, K., Hagans, K., & Linn, M. (2017). A mixed‐method efficacy and fidelity study of Check and Connect. Psychology in the Schools, 54(9), 1019-1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22038
Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Evelo, D. L., & Hurley, C. M. (1998). Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299806500101
Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100405
Strand, P. S., & Lovrich, N. P. (2014). Graduation outcomes for truant students: An evaluation of a school-based, court-engaged community truancy board with case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 43, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.05.008
Williams, K. J., Martinez, L. R., Fall, A., Miciak, J., & Vaughn, S. (2023). Student engagement among high school English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. School Psychology Review, 52(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1868948
Goulet, M., Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Bélanger, J., & Christenson, S. L. (2020). Understanding the dynamic interinfluences of implementation processes: An illustration by multiple case studies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 80, 101798-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101798
Goulet, M., Archambault, I., Janosz, M., & Christenson, S. L. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of Check & Connect in various school settings: Is intervention fidelity necessarily associated with positive outcomes? Evaluation and Program Planning, 68, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.004
Kern, L., Harrison, J. R., Custer, B. E., & Mehta, P. D. (2019). Factors that enhance the quality of relationships between mentors and mentees during check & connect. Behavioral Disorders, 44(3), 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918779791
Kloos, E., Nacik, E., & Ward, C. (2022). Developing implementation capacity of a state education agency to improve outcomes for students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 104420732210963. https://doi.oirg/10.1177/10442073221096393
Tsai, S., & Kern, L. (2019). An evaluation of treatment integrity and acceptability of Check & Connect. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(4), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618769067
Tsai, S., & Kern, L. (2020). Stability and predictors of students’ treatment acceptability of Check & Connect across time. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(4), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426619861357
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L., Williams, K. J., Miciak, J., Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2022). Effects of a reading intervention and a mentoring intervention for ninth-grade English learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(3), 558-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.2009071