Topic: Intimate Partner Violence, Safety, Sexual Assault
Target Population: Adults
Sector: Community-Based
This program is delivered to adult males who have committed acts of domestic violence and is intended to impact offenders and their partners.
The Duluth Model is a community-based approach that is designed to promote a safe environment for women who have been abused or assaulted, encourage a general understanding of harmful male-dominant actions, facilitate accountability for offenders, and initiate changes in societal acceptance of male control over females.
Evaluations of the Duluth Model have yielded mixed findings. Overall, the best-designed studies have suggested few positive outcomes for program participants. However, many of these evaluations were conducted in communities that failed to implement all aspects of the model. Furthermore, even the highest quality evaluations of the Duluth Model have included significant limitations. Two recent randomized trials have been conducted comparing Duluth Model to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). The first study compared in-person versions of both programs. Results at 1 year posttreatment indicated no differences between groups in domestic assault charges. The odds of being charged with a violent crime or a nonviolent offense were significantly higher for Duluth participants. Data from victims indicated that victims of Duluth participants reported significantly more IPV behaviors (i.e., aggressive, controlling, stalking behaviors) than victims of ACT participants. The second study compared virtual delivery of ACT vs virtual delivery of Duluth and assessed criminal justice outcomes during the year following dropout or completion. Results indicated no differences between groups in recidivism rates, although fewer ACT participants incurred new domestic violence charges and non-violent charges, while fewer Duluth participants incurred violent (non-DV) charges. ACT participants also had fewer total charges compared to Duluth. Overall, results provide evidence that the model may not work, and firm conclusions regarding program effectiveness cannot be made at this time.
The Duluth Model is based on the principle that men who batter their female partners are acting out of a belief that they are entitled to hold authority over women, and battering is a technique they use to gain control and dominate an intimate partner. The model promotes efforts to protect women and promotes accountability for offenders. The model includes the following two components:
The program focuses on changing participants' beliefs while addressing the following key themes: nonviolence, non-threatening behavior, respect, trust and support, honesty and accountability, responsible parenting, shared responsibility, economic partnership, sexual respect, and negotiation and fairness.
The Duluth Model was developed by the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project of Duluth, Minnesota. Components of the Duluth Model have been incorporated into domestic abuse-related policies and practices used in many countries around the world.
Ongoing trainings are based in Duluth, Minnesota, and customized on-site trainings are available. Please visit https://www.theduluthmodel.org/product-category/training/ or use details in the Contact section for more information.
Considerations for implementing this program include acquiring buy-in of community members and participants; obtaining training for facilitators; and coordinating multiple systems, such as mental health practitioners, the justice system, and victims' advocacy groups.
The Clearinghouse can help address these considerations. Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
If you are interested in implementing The Duluth Model, the Clearinghouse is interested in helping you!
Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
The Duluth Model is incorporated into ongoing community approaches that address domestic violence. Timing and duration of specific components vary widely. Participants typically attend weekly 1.5-hour classes for 28 to 52 weeks.
Costs associated with implementing the Duluth Model vary depending on which resources are implemented. A variety of program materials (e.g., DVDs, curricula, books) are available for purchase. Please visit https://www.theduluthmodel.org/shop/ for more information.
To move the Duluth Model to the Promising category on the Clearinghouse Continuum of Evidence, at least one evaluation should be performed demonstrating positive effects lasting at least one year from the beginning of the program or at least six months from program completion.
The Clearinghouse can help you develop an evaluation plan to ensure the program components are meeting your goals. Please call 1-877-382-9185 or email Clearinghouse@psu.edu
Contact the Clearinghouse with any questions regarding this program.
Phone: 1-877-382-9185 Email: Clearinghouse@psu.edu
You may also contact Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs by mail 202 East Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55802, phone 1-218-722-2781, fax 1-218-722-0779, email executivedirector@theduluthmodel.org, or visit https://www.theduluthmodel.org/contact-us/
Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095271
Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(6), 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.06.001
Gondolf, E. W., & Snow Jones, A. (2001). The program effect of batterer programs in three cities. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 693-704.
Herman, K., Rotunda, R., Williamson, G., & Vodanovich, S. (2014). Outcomes from a duluth model batterer intervention program at completion and long term follow-up. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2013.861316
Maxwell, C. D., Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (2010). The impact of length of domestic violence treatment on the patterns of subsequent intimate partner violence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(4), 475-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9106-4
Taylor, B. G., Davis, R. C., & Maxwell, C. D. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatment program: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 171-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100094861
Zarling, A., & Russell, D. (2022). A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and the duluth model classes for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(4), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000722
Zarling, A., Berta, M., & Granger, K. (2024). A randomized clinical trial of virtually-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy and the duluth model for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program. Journal of Family Violence, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00765-1
Arce, R., Arias, E., Novo, M., & Fariña, F. (2020). Are interventions with batterers effective? A meta-analytical review. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a11
Armenti, N. A., & Babcock, J. C. (2016). Conjoint treatment for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and implications. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 5(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000060
Bohall, G., Bautista, M., & Musson, S. (2016). Intimate partner violence and the Duluth Model: An examination of the model and recommendations for future research and practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 1029-1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9888-x
Papamichail, A., & Bates, E. A. (2019). The appropriateness of the duluth model for intimate partner violence and child-to-parent violence: A conceptual review. Partner Abuse, 10(4), 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.4.517
Scott, H. S. (2018). Extending the duluth model to workplace bullying: A modification and adaptation of the workplace power-control wheel. Workplace Health & Safety, 66(9), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917750934
van Niekerk, T. J., & Boonzaier, F. A. (2016). "The only solution there is to fight": Discourses of masculinity among South African domestically violent men. Violence Against Women, 22(3), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214555473
Zarling, A., Bannon, S., & Berta, M. (2019). Evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for domestic violence offenders. Psychology of Violence, 9(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000097